<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Email on Erkin Ekici</title><link>https://erkinekici.com/tags/email/</link><description>Recent content in Email on Erkin Ekici</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;CC BY-NC 4.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://erkinekici.com/tags/email/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Comparing email provider privacy</title><link>https://erkinekici.com/articles/comparing-email-privacy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://erkinekici.com/articles/comparing-email-privacy/</guid><description>&lt;!--&#10;Before publishing article, research those:&#10;&#10;Providers not yet in the comparison, in rough order of value:&#10;&#10;- Forward Email: open source, forwarding-first, cheap custom domains. Competes&#10; with Migadu at the low end and fills a slot nothing else covers.&#10;- Hey.com: highest reader recognition of this group. US jurisdiction, no&#10; zero-access encryption, 99 USD/yr. Expected to land near Fastmail/Hushmail.&#10;- cock.li: its servers were seized by German authorities (verify the year and&#10; jurisdiction). Every other entry's government-access score is predicted from&#10; published policy; this one has an observed outcome.&#10;- Purelymail: budget custom domains, alongside Migadu / MXroute / Namecheap.&#10;- Neomailbox: Swiss. Its ownership opacity is itself a scoreable finding.&#10;- Systemli: activist collective, overlaps Riseup and Disroot.&#10;- Autistici/Inventati: same overlap. Its police server-cloning incident (~2004)&#10; may work better as precedent inside Riseup or Disroot than as its own entry.&#10;- Thexyz: Canadian, 5 Eyes, little differentiation from Namecheap or Zoho.&#10;- Greenhost: hosting company, mail is a side product.&#10;- Pobox: Fastmail has owned it since 2015. Confirm it is still a distinct&#10; product before scoring it, otherwise it double-counts Fastmail.&#10;- OnMail: confirm the service still operates. Edison Software's history of&#10; monetising inbox-derived shopping data is the cleanest example of the failure&#10; mode this article is about, so it belongs in Out of scope if the service is&#10; gone.&#10;&#10;Facts left open because the source would not load, not because the provider is&#10;silent. One browser visit each:&#10;&#10;- Runbox: per-year request counts in the live transparency report table.&#10;- Iroco: per-GB price tiers for the Collective offer, behind a JS-rendered&#10; signup form.&#10;- Combell: accepted payment methods, never enumerated in its own docs. Also&#10; confirm which entry-tier price is current, the home page (4.49 then 2.99 EUR)&#10; or /email-hosting/basic (6.99 then 3.99 EUR).&#10;- Kolab Now: current /privacy and /pricing pages, both JS-rendered. The entry&#10; reconstructs its commitments from the ToS and a 2018 blog post.&#10;--&gt;&#10;&lt;h1 id="comparing-email-provider-privacy"&gt;Comparing email provider privacy&lt;/h1&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Which email provider actually keeps your mail private? It&amp;rsquo;s easy to pick on cost or storage and then discover the host sits in a Five Eyes jurisdiction, holds the only key to your messages, never publishes a transparency report, and quietly turns over data on request. This article compares mainstream and privacy-focused email providers under a single &lt;strong&gt;&#10;&lt;a href="#privacy-impact-framework"&#10;&#10;&gt;Privacy Impact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; score. Every claim is sourced from the provider&amp;rsquo;s own legal terms with a verbatim quote — and a &#10;&lt;a href="#audit-a-provider-yourself"&#10;&#10;&gt;reusable prompt&lt;/a&gt; lets you score any provider not listed here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>